MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164531782 · doi:10.4000/ticetsociete.6063

Stratégies des Premiers Peuples au Canada concernant les données numériques : décolonisation et souveraineté

2021· article· fr· W3164531782 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karine Gentelet, Alexandra Bahary-Dionne

Bibliographic record

VenueTic & société · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, nous proposons une réflexion à partir d’une posture d’alliées sur les enjeux de décolonisation informationnelle et de souveraineté des données. Considérant le recours croissant aux données numériques par une pluralité d’acteurs, nous cherchons à contribuer aux réflexions sur la gouvernance du numérique en y intégrant certains enjeux informationnels auxquels font face les Premiers Peuples au Canada. Nous proposons alors différentes observations qui appuient la thèse selon laquelle les stratégies numériques des Premiers Peuples, fondées sur des épistémologies traditionnelles et sur certaines structures de contrôle informationnel, ont le potentiel de mettre en œuvre une gouvernance décolonisée des données numériques qui les concernent. Ces stratégies témoigneraient alors de l’agentivité numérique des Premiers Peuples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTic & sociétéSame topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207