MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164541630 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2021-0046

Energy harvesting from car suspension using a single magnet device

2021· article· en· W3164541630 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Min‐Chie Chiu, Mansour Karkoub, Ming-Guo Her

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricityAutomotive engineeringEnergy harvestingVibrationMagnetSuspension (topology)AccelerationEnergy (signal processing)EngineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringMathematicsAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need for renewable energy sources and harvesting devices has increased over the years for environmental and economical reasons. Cars, for example, have gone through important transformations over the past decade, which led to the inception of the hybrid type. The idea is to harness some of the dissipated energy and reuse it to operate a vehicle. A lot of energy is dissipated into the environment from the suspension system; therefore, harnessing that energy could be very useful for powering up electrical systems in a car. A magnetic mass-spring system to harvest the vibrational energy dissipated from the car’s suspension system that maximizes electricity generation and minimizes ride discomfort is presented in this work. The comfort level for the passenger via three dimensionless indices, including a regenerated electricity transmissibility, displacement transmissibility performance, and ride comfort performance, is introduced. To maximize the regenerated electricity indicator and minimize the discomfort indices, a multi-objective function based on the above indices and three weighted factors in conjunction with the Simulated Annealing method is used to obtain the optimal physical parameters for the harvesting device. The theoretical developments are demonstrated under constant and varied driving speeds, and the simulation results show that the energy harvester is capable of producing reasonable amounts of electricity while maintaining a good comfort level. In fact, it was shown that the harvester can generate 0.045 V when the car travels at 60 km/h with an acceleration of 0.43 m/s 2 and assumed base excitation amplitude of 0.05 m. Higher voltages were achievable with larger base excitation amplitudes and (or) accelerations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicInnovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207