Joint Task Offloading and Allocation of Communication and Computation Resources for Energy-Efficient Mobile Edge Computing with Sequential Task Dependency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate a mobile edge computing (MEC) system with its computation task subjected to sequential task dependency, which is critical for video stream processing and intelligent MEC applications. To minimize energy consumption per mobile device while limiting task processing delay, task offloading strategy, communication resource, and computation resource are optimized jointly under both slow and fast fading channels. In slow fading channels, an optimization problem is formulated, which is mixed-integer and non-convex. To solve this challenging problem, we decompose it as a one-dimensional search of task offloading decision problem and a non-convex optimization problem with task offloading decision given. Through mathematical manipulations, the non-convex problem is transformed to be a convex one, which is shown to be solvable only with the simple Golden search method. In fast fading channels, optimal online policy depending on instant channel state is derived. In addition, it is proved that the derived policy will converge to be offline when channel coherence time is low, which can help to save extra computation complexity. Numerical results verify the correctness of our analysis and the effectiveness of our proposed strategies over existing methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".