MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164598916 · doi:10.3390/ijms22115819

A Computational Model of Kidney Function in a Patient with Diabetes

2021· review· en· W3164598916 on OpenAlexafffund
Rui Hu, Anita T. Layton

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTubuloglomerular feedbackNephronRenal functionGlomerular hyperfiltrationDiabetes mellitusMacula densaInternal medicineKidneyEndocrinologyKidney diseaseRenal HypertrophyLoop of HenleMedicineChemistryUrologyBlood pressureRenin–angiotensin systemDiabetic nephropathy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the onset of diabetes, the kidney grows large and the glomerular filtration rate becomes abnormally high. These structural and hemodynamics changes affect kidney function and may contribute to the development of chronic kidney disease. The goal of this study is to analyze how kidney function is altered in patients with diabetes and the renal effects of an anti-hyperglyceamic therapy that inhibits the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) in the proximal convoluted tubules. To accomplish that goal, we have developed a computational model of kidney function in a patient with diabetes and conducted simulations to study the effects of diabetes and SGLT2 inhibition on solute and water transport along the nephrons. Simulation results indicate that diabetes-induced hyperfiltration and tubular hypertrophy enhances Na+ transport, especially along the proximal tubules and thick ascending limbs. These simulations suggest that SGLT2 inhibition may attenuate glomerular hyperfiltration by limiting Na+-glucose transport, raising luminal [Cl−] at the macula densa, restoring the tubuloglomerular feedback signal, thereby reducing single-nephron glomerular filtration rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular SciencesSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207