Reimaginando Norteamérica bajo el TLCAN: las redes teatrales de México y Quebec como caso de estudio
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanol?Que nos dicen las redes culturales sobre agendas regionales? Este documento es parte de una investigacion mas amplia que indaga sobre las fructiferas redes de intercambio cultural, especificamente en el ambito teatral, entre la Ciudad de Mexico y la provincia de Quebec durante los anos del Tratado de Libre Comercio de America del Norte (TLCAN), 1994-2018. El trabajo explora el rol que juegan actores y agentes culturales con sus propias estrategias narrativas e intereses en la labor de imaginar comunidades en procesos de regionalizacion, observando como el trabajo imaginativo concreta agendas politicas al tiempo que invisibiliza otros tipos dinamicas de la region. En la primera parte del trabajo se exponen las ambiguedades y arbitrariedades de las demarcaciones geograficas, lo mismo que las practicas imaginativas que transforman un lugar en un espacio comun imaginado, ya sea ciudad, nacion o region. Se traza brevemente la historia conceptual de America Latina como contexto necesario para entender el papel que juega el TLCAN durante los anos noventa en la produccion de America del Norte como region imaginada. La segunda seccion es un analisis descriptivo y puntual, sin ser exhaustivo, de las principales redes de intercambio teatral entre Ciudad de Mexico y Quebec, especificamente la circulacion de textos teatrales, artistas, producciones o traducciones, que se han generado en los veinticinco anos de vigencia del TLCAN (1994-2018). Frente a estos mapas y dinamicas de colaboracion, el trabajo plantea reflexiones en torno a una serie de preguntas: ?que nos dice la relacion entre idea e infraestructura material sobre el papel que juega la produccion cultural en el funcionamiento politico y economico de una region? Mas especificamente, ?que intenciones y estrategias politicas, economicas e ideacionales en Mexico y Quebec podemos vislumbrar en el analisis de sus redes de intercambio culturales a partir de la entrada en vigor del TLCAN? EnglishWhat do cultural networks tell us about regional agendas? This document is part of a broader investigation into the productive networks of cultural exchange – specifically in the field of theater – between Mexico City and Quebec during the NAFTA/TLCAN/ALENA years (1994-2018). The paper explores the role that the work of imagining communities plays in regionalization processes, observing how this imaginative labor renders political agendas concrete, at the same time that it invisiblizes other forms of contact and cultural tensions within the region. The first section exposes the ambiguities and arbitrariness of geographic demarcations and of imaginative practices that transform space into a shared imagined place, be it city, nation or region. It presents a brief overview of the conceptual history of Latin America as necessary context in understanding the role that NAFTA played during the nineties in producing North America as an imagined region. The second section is a descriptive overview, without being exhaustive, of the primary networks of exchange between Mexico City and Quebec, specifically in the circulation of theater texts, artists, productions and translations generated during the twenty-five years of NAFTA. In the face of these maps of exchange, the paper asks: what does the relationship between idea and material infrastructure reveal about the role of cultural production in the political and economic inner-workings of a region? More specifically, what may be discerned from the analysis of Mexico and Quebec‟s theatre networks, of their political, economic and ideational intentions and strategies as regional actors?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it