MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164612628 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac1921

A Bright Fast Radio Burst from FRB 20200120E with Sub-100 Nanosecond Structure

2021· preprint· en· W3164612628 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Walid A. Majid, Aaron B. Pearlman, Thomas A. Prince, Robert Wharton, C. J. Naudet, Karishma Bansal, Mohit Bhardwaj, Shriharsh P. Tendulkar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill Space InstituteFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesJet Propulsion LaboratoryNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekUniversities Space Research AssociationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Defense Science and Engineering GraduateMcGill UniversityU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsFast radio burstPhysicsAstrophysicsLuminosityBrightnessGalaxyPulsarRadio spectrumAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We have detected a bright radio burst from FRB 20200120E with the NASA Deep Space Network (DSN) 70 m dish (DSS-63) at radio frequencies between 2.2 and 2.3 GHz. This repeating fast radio burst (FRB) is reported to be associated with a globular cluster in the M81 galactic system. With high time resolution recording, low scattering, and large intrinsic brightness of the burst, we find a burst duration of ∼30 μs, comprised of several narrow components with typical separations of 2–3 μs. The narrowest component has a width of ≲100 ns, which corresponds to a light travel time size as small as 30 m. The peak flux density of the narrowest burst component is 270 Jy. We estimate the total spectral luminosity of the narrowest component of the burst to be 4 × 1030 erg s−1 Hz−1, which is a factor of ∼500 above the luminosities of the so-called “nanoshots” associated with giant pulses from the Crab pulsar. This spectral luminosity is also higher than that of the radio bursts detected from the Galactic magnetar SGR 1935 + 2154 during its outburst in April 2020, but it falls on the low-end of the currently measured luminosity distribution of extragalatic FRBs, further indicating the presence of a continuum of FRB luminosities. The temporal separation of the individual components has similarities to the quasiperiodic behavior seen in the microstructure of some pulsars. The known empirical relation between the microstructure quasiperiodicity timescale and the rotation period of pulsars possibly suggests a possible pulsar as the source of this FRB, with a rotation period of a few milliseconds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207