MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164633101 · doi:10.48336/n1s2-fn20

Quantum dynamics with classical noise

2022· dissertation· en· W3164633101 on OpenAlexaff
Qin Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Applications
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQubitQuantum entanglementQuantum mechanicsNoise (video)PhysicsDiagonalStatistical physicsMathematicsQuantumComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, we study the evolution of qubits evolving according to the Schrödinger equation with a Hamiltonian containing noise terms, modeled by random diagonal and off-diagonal matrix elements. For a single qubit exposed to such noise, we show that the noise-averaged qubit density matrix converges to a specific final state, in the limit of large time t. We find that the convergence speed is polynomial in 1=t, with a power that depends on the regularity and the low frequency behaviour of the noise probability density. We evaluate the final state explicitly in the regimes of weak and strong off-diagonal noise. We show that the process implements the well-known dephasing channel in the localized and delocalized basis, respectively. Furthermore, we consider the evolution of the entanglement of two (or more) qubits subject to Gaussian noises with varying means and variances. We consider two different cases: individual noise where each qubit feels an independent noise, and common noise where all qubits are subjected to the same noise. We find the following characteristics of entanglement, measured by the concurrence of qubits. Initially entangled states lose their amount of entanglement in time due to the presence of the noise. The decay of entanglement happens more quickly for common noise than for individual noise. We also detect creation of entanglement due to the common noise: for some initially disentangled states, entanglement is created for intermediate times and then decays to zero in the long time again.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207