Association of breastfeeding duration with carotid intima-media thickness in later life: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship of breastfeeding duration with maternal ultrasound carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in later life. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central database searching up to December 15, 2020, for eligible studies that reported on the breastfeeding duration and ultrasound measurement of CIMT in later life. The exposed group corresponded to breastfeeding duration ≥ 6 months whereas the control group was women with breastfeeding of shorter duration or nil breastfeeding. The methodological quality of reviewed articles was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results are reported as the mean difference (MD) or the standardized MD (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The study was registered in the PROSPERO database. RESULTS: 1-5 months (NOS: 7-8). Common CIMT was lower in women who breastfed for a longer duration (SMD = -0.10, 95% CI -0.20 to -0.00). Circulating HDL-cholesterol was higher in women with longer breastfeeding duration (MD = 3.25, 95% CI 0.88-5.61). There were no significant differences for total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, and blood pressure between breastfeeding 6 or more months and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The available studies showed lower CIMT and higher HDL-cholesterol levels in women who breastfed for 6 or more months as compared to controls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it