MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164689996 · doi:10.36351/pjo.v33i3.47

Leadership Development in Ophthalmology: Investing In the Future of the Profession

2017· article· en· W3164689996 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Catherine Green

Bibliographic record

VenuePakistan Journal of Ophthalmology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Quality and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcknowledgementAccreditationCore competencyMedical educationHealthcare deliveryHealth professionalsMedical professionGraduate medical educationHealth careMedicinePolitical sciencePublic relationsManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the last two decades, there has been widespread acknowledgement that the medical professionals of today and the future require a much broader skill set than just good clinical knowledge and expertise. These additional skills and competencies have been formally articulated by medical societies and organisations, for example the CanMEDS framework outlined by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada1 and the Core Competencies of the Accreditation Council for Postgraduate Medical Education (ACGME)2. Healthcare organisations around the world have reiterated that effective leadership should be present at all levels, whether it is a clinical or academic field3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.822

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.328
GPT teacher head0.515
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePakistan Journal of OphthalmologySame topicHealthcare Quality and ManagementFrench-language works237,207