MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164695878 · doi:10.82308/43317

Push and pull participant recruitment system for vehicular crowdsensing

2021· article· en· W3164695878 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tzuyang Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsComputer scienceCrowdsensingComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crowdsensing, the use of everyday devices to collect and share data is paving the way for cost-efficient real-time data collection. Every day, information can be quickly sensed and shared publicly using smartphones. Beyond smartphones, modern vehicles have also shown great promise for crowdsensing. In contrast to mobile crowdsensing, vehicles are ideal platforms to collect, store, compute, and share large amounts of sensor data. Vehicles have greater mobility and cover wider sensing area. The mobility patterns of vehicles are predictable due to the prevalence of navigation systems. Most importantly, the abundance of on-board resources and lack of power constraints makes it possible to support complex and long-lasting sensing tasks. The idea behind vehicular crowdsensing is to leverage vehicles as mobile sensors and computing resources. Vehicles are recruited as sensing participants for large-scale crowdsensing tasks such as urban sensing or traffic condition monitoring. However, existing works often assume that sensing tasks are common tasks where sensing results are shared with the public. Instead of public information, we believe the benefit of the crowdsensing paradigm should be available for personal use. In this, we focus on small-scale sensing tasks, tasks that dynamically change over time and are unlikely to be shared. Thus, sensing information is collected on demand rather than continuously and at all times. We refer to this as personalized vehicular crowdsensing. Furthermore, most works assume the routing of vehicular participants cannot be changed. This further reduces a system's ability to fulfill dynamic sensing needs. Thus, in this thesis, we further explore the possibilities of improving crowdsensing performance by vehicle route planning. To achieve either public vehicular crowdsensing or personalized vehicular crowdsensing, we must resolve the problem of vehicular participant selection. We first propose two solutions based on push and pull for vehicular crowdsensing. We aim to maximize sensing coverage, improve load balance, error tolerance, and minimize costs. Next, we improve the sensing performance by allowing vehicles to reroute. Instead of greedily generating routes to maximize overall sensing coverage, we leverage a two-step global and local planning algorithm. Our global algorithm attempts to plan a vehicle's route based on the difference between the distribution of vehicular location and the distribution of task location. Our goal is to send vehicles to areas with a high number of tasks but having few vehicles to service them. The global algorithm does not determine which tasks it should service; this operation is handled by the local algorithm which decides how to optimally leverage a vehicle's sensing ability for a small area. Through the use of SUMO simulation and TAPAS Cologne Large Scale Mobility Dataset, we show that our proposed approaches deliver significant performance improvements compared to traditional approaches

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingFrench-language works237,207