LINHAS DE FUGA E MODOS DE SUBJETIVAÇÃO: O GRUPO BTS (방탄소년단) COMO MODO DE VIDA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabalho tem como objetivo definir os dispositivos de governo da vida, e entender os processos de subjetivacao dos sujeitos dados por meio destes. E possivel perceber um tensionamento entre os dispositivos de assujeitamento, desta forma tendo impacto direto na construcao do ser. A juventude entra aqui como publico direcional, no processo de sua introducao ativa na sociedade contemporânea. E possivel um modo de vida que nao unicamente assujeitado pelos dispositivos de vigilância? Existe uma rota de fuga a qual permite um processo de subjetivacao no intermedio entre as linhas duras e maleaveis deste processo, entre micro e macropoliticas. E, portanto, utilizando o grupo BTS, e sua musica No More Dream, que se mostra e relaciona-se uma nova forma de expressao do ser. Mesmo com os impactos da sociedade de desempenho e do cansaco, mesmo que tensionados pelos dispositivos de governamentalidade, e possivel a expressao e construcao de si por um modo de vida que nao completamente capturado pelas sociedades de controle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".