MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164812074

A quienes sancionar? Maximos responsables y participacion determinante en la Jurisdiccion Especial para la Paz

2020· article· es· W3164812074 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sabine Michalowski, Michael Cruz Rodríguez, Hobeth Martínez Carrillo

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Access at Essex (University of Essex) · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
KeywordsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Catedrática de Derecho en la Universidad de Essex y codirectora de la Red de Justicia Transicional de Essex (ETJN).Sus intereses académicos se enfocan, entre otros, en la complicidad de actores económicos en graves violaciones a derechos humanos y en cómo enfrentarlos en procesos transicionales.Entre sus publicaciones más recientes se encuentran Los terceros complejos: la competencia limitada de la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz (Dejusticia, 2019) y Terceros civiles ante la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz (Dejusticia 2020)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.014
Scholarly communication0.0130.007
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueOpen Access at Essex (University of Essex)Same topicComparative constitutional jurisprudence studiesFrench-language works237,207