Data-Driven Energy Conservation in Cellular Networks: A Systems Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The energy consumption of mobile networks is already substantial nowadays, and only expected to further increase with the roll-out of 5G. Base stations are the key elements in this context: reducing their energy consumption is of paramount importance for network operators, not only to lower operating costs, but also to meet sustainable development goals. Today's base stations are typically over-provisioned, i.e., they comprise multiple cells to meet the peak load in a region. Therefore, substantial energy savings are possible by switching off cells that are under-utilized. This article proposes a data-driven approach to determine the time periods when a cell can be switched off. Forecasting is used to accurately predict network utilization and automatically find the time intervals to reliably switch off a cell. We carefully analyze the requirements of the system as a whole, from data collection to forecasting methods, to enable effective energy savings in practice. Considering several real-world traces from LTE networks, we show that an average of 10.24% energy savings is possible. We explore the trade-offs between energy savings and overhead in switching off cells, and provide insights into the choice of methods accordingly. In particular, we show that the accuracy of forecasting is not the most important factor in achieving energy savings; instead, the prediction (uncertainty) interval plays a key role in being able to achieve energy savings with less impact on end-users. Finally, we propose a model to generate utilization traces that match the distribution of real-world traces obtained from cellular networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it