Assessment of the Local Mechano-Electrochemical Effect on Pipeline Defects by 2D and 3D Finite Element Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Local corrosion at a defect on a pipeline was assessed using both 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) finite element models under mechano-electrochemical (M-E) interaction. While the M-E interaction increases corrosion activity at the defect, the assessment of M-E interaction would have different results using 2D and 3D models. Compared with the 3D model, the 2D model produces a greater local stress, a higher local plastic strain, a more negative corrosion potential and a higher anodic current density at the defect, and thus, a lower threshold internal pressure causing local yielding. The 3D model is more conservative for corrosion rate prediction of corroded pipelines. A new concept, rAZ (the ratio of the anodic zone length to defect length in the 2D model, or the ratio of the anodic zone area to the defect area in the 3D model), is proposed to define growth mode of the corrosion defect. There is a smaller rAZ produced in 2D model. At specific internal pressures, the 2D model predicts an ellipsoidal defect center area experiencing accelerated corrosion and potentially resulting in pipeline leaking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".