MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3164852916 · doi:10.1002/asmb.2635

Closed‐form approximated pricing of multivariate derivatives under switching regime models

2021· article· en· W3164852916 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexánder Álvarez, Atousa Assadi, Kai Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (Canada)University of Prince Edward Island
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMarkov chainMultivariate statisticsStochastic volatilityVolatility (finance)Quadratic equationApplied mathematicsConstant (computer programming)EconometricsMarkov chain Monte CarloMathematicsMonte Carlo methodMathematical optimizationComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Markov switching regime models have played an increasingly important role in finance and economics, especially for business cycles and long swings in currencies. Regime‐switching models provide a simple way to capture stochastic volatility and thus overcomes the drawback of the classical lognormality assumption characterized by constant volatility. This paper considers multivariate Black and Scholes type models with a Markov regime‐switching mechanism. We show that the pricing of some multivariate derivatives under models where the Markov chain has two or three states, can be approximated accurately in closed‐form, based on linear and quadratic Taylor polynomials. Closed form approximation methods are computationally advantageous as they perform in constant time, compared with alternative methods such as Monte‐Carlo, where the accuracy of the estimation is directly linked to the number of executed simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Stochastic Models in Business and IndustrySame topicStochastic processes and financial applicationsFrench-language works237,207