Explicit model predictive control of permanent magnet synchronous motors based on multi-point linearization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs) have been broadly applied in servo-drive applications. It is necessary to improve the performance of PMSM. An explicit controller designed for PMSM based on multi-point linearization is proposed to reduce the linearized model error caused by different running status of PMSM. The mathematical model of PMSM system in the synchronous rotating frame and the problem formulation are introduced at first. Then, the preliminaries about explicit model predictive control (MPC) algorithm are presented in this article. Based on this, the multi-point linearization model is created for explicit MPC controller design. Moreover, the block diagram of the proposed method for PMSM system is presented. Finally, the simulation results are provided to demonstrate that the proposed explicit MPC controller based on multi-point linearization achieves better performance than that based on traditional single-point linearization, but requires the same online computation time because of the offline optimization of explicit MPC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it