Male to hermaphrodite sex change in gametophytes of the fern <i>Ceratopteris richardii</i> is affected by hermaphrodite density, male age, and male size
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gametophytes of the fern Ceratopteris richardii Brongn. are either male or hermaphrodite. The presence of hermaphrodite-secreted antheridiogen influences gametophytes to develop as male (induction), while its absence leads to hermaphrodite development. Males require the continued presence of antheridiogen to remain male. Removal of males from antheridiogen leads to sex change (conversion) of males to hermaphrodites. The density of hermaphrodites that males were exposed to and the amount of time males were exposed to antheridiogen were experimentally manipulated to determine whether conversion time was affected. Analysis of covariance was employed with male size serving as a covariate. The results suggest that males continuously sample the neighborhood for information regarding the density of hermaphrodites by perceiving hermaphrodite-secreted antheridiogen, then use this information to determine whether to convert to hermaphrodite. Larger males converted faster than smaller males, suggesting a potential for smaller males to remain male once larger males convert. Conversion time was longer in males grown in higher densities of hermaphrodites and shorter in males exposed to antheridiogen for a longer time, suggesting that males increase sensitivity to antheridiogen with higher doses but decrease sensitivity as they age. It is thought that such “decision making” is important for C. richardii populations to maintain beneficial sex ratios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".