DEK-AFF2 Carcinoma of the Sinonasal Region and Skull Base
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel DEK-AFF2 fusion was recently reported in 4 nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinomas of the sinonasal region and skull base, including 1 with exceptional response to immunotherapy, but it is not yet clear if this rearrangement defines a unique clinicopathologic category or represents a rare event. This study aims to characterize a larger cohort of carcinomas with DEK-AFF2 fusions to assess whether they truly constitute a distinctive entity. Among 27 sinonasal and skull base nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma that were negative for human papillomavirus and Epstein-Barr virus, RNA sequencing identified DEK-AFF2 fusions in 13 cases (48%). Nine were centered in the nasal cavity, 2 in the middle ear/temporal bone, 1 in the nasopharynx, and 1 in the orbit. These tumors displayed recurrent histologic features including (1) complex endophytic and exophytic, frequently papilloma-like growth, (2) transitional epithelium with eosinophilic to amphophilic cytoplasm, (3) absent or minimal keratinization with occasional compact keratin pearls, (4) monotonous nuclei, and (5) prominent tumor-infiltrating neutrophils or stromal lymphocytes. This appearance not only overlaps with high-grade basaloid sinonasal carcinomas but also with benign papillomas and tumors reported as low-grade papillary Schneiderian carcinoma. However, DEK-AFF2 carcinomas showed frequent local recurrence, cervical lymph node metastases, and distant metastasis with 2 deaths from disease, confirming they are aggressive malignancies despite relatively bland histology. Overall, the distinctive molecular, histologic, and clinical features of DEK-AFF2 carcinomas suggest they represent a unique entity in the sinonasal region. This tumor merits increased pathologic recognition to better understand its prognostic and therapeutic implications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".