Polyvinylpyrrolidone in hemodialysis membranes: Impact on platelet loss during hemodialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Hydrophilic modification with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) increases the biocompatibility profile of synthetic dialysis membranes. However, PVP may be eluted into the patient's blood, which has been discussed as a possible cause for adverse reactions rarely occurring with synthetic membranes. We investigated the content of PVP and its elution from the blood‐side surface from commercially available dialyzers, including the novel FX CorAL, with PVP‐enriched and α‐tocopherol‐stabilized membrane, and link the results to the level of platelet loss during dialysis as a maker of biocompatibility. Methods Six synthetic, PVP containing, dialyzers (FX CorAL, FX CorDiax [Fresenius Medical Care]; Polyflux, THERANOVA [Baxter]; ELISIO [Nipro]; xevonta [B. Braun]) were investigated in the present study. The content of PVP on blood‐side surface was determined with X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The amount of elutable PVP was measured photometrically after 5 h recirculation. The level of platelet loss was evaluated in an ex vivo recirculation model with human blood. Findings Highest PVP content on the blood‐side surface was found for the polysulfone‐based FX CorAL (26.3%), while the polyethersulfone‐based THERANOVA (15.6%) had the lowest PVP content. Elution of PVP was highest for the autoclave steam‐sterilized THERANOVA (9.1 mg/1.6 m2 dialyzer) and Polyflux (9.0 mg/1.6 m2 dialyzer), while the lowest PVP elution was found for the INLINE steam sterilized FX CorAL and FX CorDiax (<0.5 mg/1.6 m2 dialyzer, for both). Highest platelet loss was found for xevonta (+164.4% compared to the reference) and the lowest for the FX CorAL (−225.2%) among the polysulfone‐based dialyzers; among the polyethersulfone‐based dialyzers, THERANOVA (+95.5%) had the highest and ELISIO (−52.1%) the lowest platelet loss. Discussion Polyvinylpyrrolidone content and elution differ between commercially available dialyzers and were found to be linked to the membrane material and sterilization method. The amount of non‐eluted PVP on the blood‐side surface may be an important determinant for the biocompatibility of dialyzers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".