MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165162383 · doi:10.1007/s11136-021-02890-6

Correction to: Response shift in patient-reported outcomes: definition, theory, and a revised model

2021· erratum· en· W3165162383 on OpenAlexaff
Antoine Vanier, Frans J. Oort, Leah McClimans, Nikki Ow, Bernice G. Gulek, Jan R. Böhnke, Mirjam A. G. Sprangers, Véronique Sebille, Nancy E. Mayo

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality of Life Research · 2021
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality of Life ResearchItem response theoryPublic healthPsychologyMedicineClinical psychologyPsychometricsNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02890-6

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.280
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.280
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0080.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1440.082

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.608
GPT teacher head0.529
Teacher spread0.079 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuality of Life ResearchSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207