MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165232308 · doi:10.1007/s40894-021-00162-5

Correction to: Studies on the Acculturation of Young Refugees in the Educational Domain: A Scoping Review of Research and Methods

2021· review· en· W3165232308 on OpenAlexaff
Débora B. Maehler, Steffen Pötzschke, Howard Ramos, Paul Pritchard, Johanna Fleckenstein

Bibliographic record

VenueAdolescent Research Review · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcculturationRefugeeDomain (mathematical analysis)PsychologyData scienceSociologyMathematics educationLibrary sciencePolitical scienceComputer scienceAnthropologyEthnic groupMathematicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-021-00162-5

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.046
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.322
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0460.322
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0150.019
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0090.008
Research integrity0.0100.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0840.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.432
GPT teacher head0.660
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdolescent Research ReviewSame topicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugeesFrench-language works237,207