Conceptual Framework for a Decision-Making Model to Select thePublic-Private Partnership (PPP) Structure for Urban Rail Transit inJakarta
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PPP scheme has been widely recognized as a cooperation between government and private sector to provide public service, both in developed and developing countries. In contrast with developed countries, PPP implementation faces several challenges in developing countries. Private sectors in developing countries tend to deliver an unsolicited PPP project; however, it is difficult for the government to define the appropriate PPP structure for a specific project due to lack of knowledge and experience. This paper focuses on developing a conceptual framework for a decision-making model to select the PPP structure model for urban rail transit. A clearly defined PPP structure at the early stages allows both parties' allocation of responsibility and risk. It provides exact direction on the PPP project implementation, commonly established in a long-term contract period. It is expected that the multi-criteria decision-making tools by using the AHP approach may contribute as a guideline to support decision-makers in selecting the appropriate PPP structure for urban rail transit, particularly on unsolicited PPP proposal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it