La pharmacie civile et urbaine au XVIIIe siècle. Étude comparative (France-Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En colonisant le Canada aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles, la France implante des institutions. Cette communication a pour objectif de faire état des résultats de la thèse terminée portant sur l’introduction de l’une de ces institutions françaises : la pharmacie, à travers les exemples de deux régions liées historiquement par le mouvement migratoire, la Basse-Normandie et le Canada. Dans ce contexte de rapport métropole-colonie, il s’agit de comprendre le passage du modèle pharmaceutique entre un pays vieux et un pays jeune qui vit dans un contexte nord-américain. Trois axes directeurs sont retenus : l’organisation professionnelle ; puis, la pratique thérapeutique ; enfin le niveau social et économique. Ces trois points essentiels mettent en exergue que le Canada, par rapport à la France, garde des éléments typiques de la pharmacie et crée sa propre originalité sur d’autres aspects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.019 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".