Queen Pregnancy Increases Group Estradiol Levels in Cooperatively Breeding Naked Mole-Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For cooperative species, there can be great value in the synchronization of physiological states to coordinate group behavioral states. This is evident in naked mole-rats (Heterocephalus glaber), which have the most extreme form of cooperative breeding in mammals. Colonies have a single reproductive female, "the queen," and 1-3 breeding males. These breeders are supported by adult "subordinates," which are all socially suppressed into a pre-pubertal state. Subordinates cooperate in colony maintenance, defense, and alloparental care. Prior work has reported that there may be social sharing of hormones among individuals in the colony because when the queen is pregnant, subordinates of both sexes develop enlarged nipples and female subordinates can develop vaginal perforation. We sought to document the hormonal changes and mechanisms behind these observations. We found that subordinate estradiol levels were elevated during the queen's pregnancy and were correlated with queen levels. To determine if this occurs by direct hormone-sharing, where group members uptake the hormones of conspecifics through excreta or the skin, we then tested whether treating a single subordinate in the colony with estradiol would induce the same effect in other colony members. It did not, which indicates that the influence on group estradiol levels may be specific to cues from the queen. These queen cues may be behavioral in nature, as we found that queens were less aggressive during pregnancy, which prior work has suggested may relax reproductive suppression of subordinates. Yet, levels of queen aggression alone were not associated, or were weakly associated, with their colony's estradiol levels, though our sample size examining this particular relationship was low. This is suggestive that additional queen cues of reproductive status, beyond just aggression, may be relevant in influencing the subordinate hormonal change, or that the relationship between aggression and colony estradiol levels is more subtle and would need to be elucidated with a larger sample size. These results have implications for how cooperative breeders coordinate reproduction and alloparental care, and how social cues can influence individual and group physiology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".