MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165420722 · doi:10.5325/jafrideve.21.1.0001

Understanding Digitalization in the African Context

2020· article· en· W3165420722 on OpenAlex
Gbadebo Odularu, Bamidele Adekunle

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of African Development · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicVulnerability (computing)Context (archaeology)Development economicsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Psychological interventionPolitical scienceEconomic growthInequalityPopulationSustainable developmentGeographySociologyEconomicsPsychologyMedicineComputer securityComputer scienceDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT During the pre-coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic era, Africa was one of the fastest growing regions in the world. However, much of the population live in underserved communities in which vulnerability risks are higher than the continental average. Thus, it is theoretically established that deepening digital divide is one of many systemic inequalities that Africa faces and will largely grapple with in the post-COVID-19 era. This necessitates leveraging on cutting edge and evidence-based policy experiences from other countries toward the adoption of digitally innovative and sustainable developmental approaches. The main objective of this editorial is to articulate digitalization—related and workable policy interventions for fostering inclusive development while mitigating the adverse impact of its unforeseen circumstances in Africa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it