MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165464716 · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqab172

Early prenatal use of a multivitamin diminishes the risk for inadequate vitamin D status in pregnant women: results from the Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals (MIREC) cohort study

2021· article· en· W3165464716 on OpenAlexafffund
Hope A. Weiler, Stephen P.J. Brooks, Kurtis Sarafin, Mandy Fisher, Isabelle Massarelli, The Minh Luong, Markey Johnson, Anne‐Sophie Morisset, Linda Dodds, Shayne Taback, Michael Helewa, Peter von Dadelszen, Graeme N. Smith, Bruce P. Lanphear, William D. Fraser, Tye E. Arbuckle

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeQueen's UniversitySimon Fraser UniversityHealth CanadaUniversity of ManitobaDalhousie UniversityUniversité de MontréalUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMultivitaminMedicinePregnancyVitamin D and neurologyObstetricsCohort studyOdds ratioProspective cohort studyCohortVitaminPrenatal careLogistic regressionPopulationGynecologyInternal medicineEnvironmental healthBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Reports on the adequacy of vitamin D status of pregnant women are not available in Canada. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to examine vitamin D status across pregnancy and identify the correlates of vitamin D status of pregnant women in Canada. METHODS: Pregnant women (≥18 years) from 6 provinces (2008-2011) participating in a longitudinal cohort were studied. Sociodemographic data, obstetrical histories, and dietary and supplemental vitamin D intakes were surveyed. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) was measured using an immunoassay standardized to LC-MS/MS from samples collected during the first (n = 1905) and third trimesters (n = 1649) and at delivery (n = 1543). The proportion of women with ≥40 nmol/L of plasma 25OHD (adequate status) was estimated at each time point, and factors related to achieving this cut point were identified using repeated-measures logistic regression. Differences in 25OHD concentrations across trimesters and at delivery were tested a using repeated-measures ANOVA with a post hoc Tukey's test. RESULTS: In the first trimester, 93.4% (95% CI: 92.3%-94.5%) of participants had 25OHD ≥40 nmol/L. The mean plasma 25OHD concentration increased from the first to the third trimester and then declined by delivery (69.8 ± 0.5 nmol/L, 78.6 ± 0.7 nmol/L, and 75.7 ± 0.7 nmol/L, respectively; P < 0.0001). A lack of multivitamin use early in pregnancy reduced the odds of achieving 25OHD ≥40 nmol/L (ORadj = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.25-0.42) across all time points. Factors associated with not using a prenatal multivitamin included multiparity (ORadj = 2.08; 95% CI: 1.42-3.02) and a below-median income (ORadj = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.02-1.89). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this cohort demonstrate the importance of early multivitamin supplement use to achieve an adequate vitamin D status in pregnant women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical NutritionSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207