An Interpretable Object Detection-Based Model For The Diagnosis Of Neonatal Lung Diseases Using Ultrasound Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the last few decades, Lung Ultrasound (LUS) has been increasingly used to diagnose and monitor different lung diseases in neonates. It is a noninvasive tool that allows a fast bedside examination while minimally handling the neonate. Acquiring a LUS scan is easy, but understanding the artifacts concerned with each respiratory disease is challenging. Mixed artifact patterns found in different respiratory diseases may limit LUS readability by the operator. While machine learning (ML), especially deep learning can assist in automated analysis, simply feeding the ultrasound images to an ML model for diagnosis is not enough to earn the trust of medical professionals. The algorithm should output LUS features that are familiar to the operator instead. Therefore, in this paper we present a unique approach for extracting seven meaningful LUS features that can be easily associated with a specific pathological lung condition: Normal pleura, irregular pleura, thick pleura, A- lines, Coalescent B-lines, Separate B-lines and Consolidations. These artifacts can lead to early prediction of infants developing later respiratory distress symptoms. A single multi-class region proposal-based object detection model faster-RCNN (fRCNN) was trained on lower posterior lung ultrasound videos to detect these LUS features which are further linked to four common neonatal diseases. Our results show that fRCNN surpasses single stage models such as RetinaNet and can successfully detect the aforementioned LUS features with a mean average precision of 86.4%. Instead of a fully automatic diagnosis from images without any interpretability, detection of such LUS features leave the ultimate control of diagnosis to the clinician, which can result in a more trustworthy intelligent system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".