Educação sexual: uma proposta para a Educação de Jovens e Adultos do Ensino Fundamental II
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The theme of this research in Science Education is Sexual Education (SE) aimed at students of Youth and Adult Education (YAE) of Elementary Education (EE) II, within the qualitative approach of pedagogical intervention. Its study objective was to investigate the sexuality conceptions of students from YEA, as well as to propose and develop a pedagogical training intervention with ES in a school provisionally allocated in a settlement, in the municipality of Monte Alegre de Minas / MG. This research is justified due to the absence of discussions on the theme, lack of specific material for the teaching and learning process for this audience in addressing the contents of sexuality, which is restricted to Science teachers. The target audience was composed of a total of 26 students, 8 men and 18 women, with ages ranging from 27 to 82 years. Data collection was carried out in 3 phases: Initial Questionnaire (IQ), Didactic Sequence (DS) and Final Questionnaire (FQ). The DS, the educational product of this study, was composed of texts, dynamics and workshops. The results presented possibilities for discussing the different themes of sexuality, including gender, based on the experiences and knowledge of these students. It is suggested the development of DS that adapts the transversality of the themes of sexuality to the reality of the students. Likewise, it is considered that SD was a two-way street in the education of the teacher and the students regarding the understanding of sexuality themes without prejudice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".