MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165540246 · doi:10.1101/2021.05.26.21257861

Assessing multiplex tiling PCR sequencing approaches for detecting genomic variants of SARS-CoV-2 in municipal wastewater

2021· preprint· en· W3165540246 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Xuan Lin, Melissa B. Glier, Kevin S. Kuchinski, Tenysha Ross-Van Mierlo, David McVea, John R. Tyson, Natalie Prystajecky, Ryan Ziels

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBritish Columbia Centre for Disease ControlInnovate BC
KeywordsWastewaterAmpliconMultiplexPrimer (cosmetics)Amplicon sequencingBiologyGenomeComputational biologyGeneticsPolymerase chain reactionEnvironmental scienceGeneEnvironmental engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Wastewater-based genomic surveillance of the SARS-CoV-2 virus shows promise to complement genomic epidemiology efforts. Multiplex tiled PCR is a desirable approach for targeted genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater due to its low cost and rapid turnaround time. However, it is not clear how different multiplex tiled PCR primer schemes or wastewater sample matrices impact the resulting SARS-CoV-2 genome coverage. The objective of this work was to assess the performance of three different multiplex primer schemes, consisting of 150bp, 400bp, and 1200bp amplicons, as well as two wastewater sample matrices, influent wastewater and primary sludge, for targeted genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2. Wastewater samples were collected weekly from five municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the Metro Vancouver region of British Columbia, Canada during a period of increased COVID-19 case counts from February to April, 2021. RNA extracted from clarified influent wastewater provided significantly higher genome coverage (breadth and median depth) than primary sludge samples across all primer schemes. Shorter amplicons appeared more resilient to sample RNA degradation, but were hindered by greater primer pool complexity in the 150bp scheme. The identified optimal primer scheme (400bp) and sample matrix (influent) was capable of detecting the emergence of mutations associated with genomic variants of concern, of which the daily wastewater load significantly correlated with clinical case counts. Taken together, these results provide guidance on best practices for implementing wastewater-based genomic surveillance, and demonstrate its ability to inform epidemiology efforts by detecting genomic variants of concern circulating within a geographic region. Importance Monitoring the genomic characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 virus circulating in a population can shed important insights into epidemiological aspects of the COVID-19 outbreak. Sequencing every clinical patient sample in a highly populous area is a difficult feat, and thus sequencing SARS-CoV-2 RNA in municipal wastewater offers great promise to augment genomic surveillance by characterizing a pooled population sample matrix, particularly during an escalating outbreak. Here, we assess different approaches and sample matrices for rapid targeted genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in municipal wastewater. We demonstrate that the optimal approach is capable of detecting the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 genomic variants of concern, with strong correlations to clinical case data in the province of British Columbia. These results provide guidance on best practices on, as well as further support for, the application of wastewater genomic surveillance as a tool to augment current genomic epidemiology efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.269
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.094 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingFrench-language works237,207