MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165570722 · doi:10.1109/mits.2021.3070651

Acclimatizing the Operational Design Domain for Autonomous Driving Systems

2021· article· en· W3165570722 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSafety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Domain (mathematical analysis)Task (project management)Process (computing)Computer scienceSystems engineeringIterative and incremental developmentWork (physics)Proof of conceptTransport engineeringSimulationEngineeringSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The operational design domain (ODD) of an automated driving system (ADS) can be used to confine the environmental scope of where the ADS is safe to execute. ODD acclimatization is one of the necessary steps for validating vehicle safety in complex traffic environments. This article proposes an approach and architectural design to extract and enhance the ODD of the ADS based on the task scenario and the corresponding requirements in the development and verification cycle. The ODD is tightly focused on a unified quantifiable environmental model in the proposed approach while overseeing the ODD extraction process by formal specifications. In addition to the acclimatization framework, an implementation of the proposed approach is examined with two learning-based agents to demonstrate its feasibility. The proof of concept has shown promising directions for future work on ODD monitoring and on the applications in iterative development for ADSs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it