Inhibition of triple negative breast cancer metastasis and invasiveness by novel drugs that target epithelial to mesenchymal transition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Invasive breast cancer (BrCa) is predicted to affect 1 in 9 women in a lifetime;1 in 32 will die from this disease. The most aggressive forms of BrCa, basal-like/triple-negative phenotype (TNBC), are challenging to treat and result in higher mortality due high number of metastatic cases. There is a paucity of options for TNBC treatment, which highlights the need for additional innovative treatment approaches. NIH-III mice were injected in the abdominal mammary fat pad with luciferase-expressing derivative of the human TNBC cell line, MDA-MB-231 cells. Animals were gavage-fed with nitrofen at the doses of 1, 3 or 6 mg/kg/alternate days. However, several structural properties/components of nitrofen raise concerns, including its high lipophilicity (cLogP of nearly 5) and a potential toxophore in the form of a nitroarene group. Therefore, we developed analogues of nitrofen which lack the nitro group and/or have replaced the diaryl ether linker with a diarylamine that could allow modulation of polarity. In vitro anti-invasiveness activity of nitrofen analogues were evaluated by quantitative determination of invasion of MDA-MB-231-Luciferase cells through Matrigel using a Boyden chamber. Our in vivo data show that nitrofen efficiently blocks TNBC tumor metastasis. In vitro data suggest that this is not due to cytotoxicity, but rather is due to impairment of invasive capacity of the cells. Further, using an in vitro model of EMT, we show that nitrofen interferes with the process of EMT and promotes mesenchymal to epithelial transformation. In addition, we show that three of the nitrofen analogues significantly reduced invasive potential of TNBC cells, which may, at least partially, be attributed to the analogues' ability to promote mesenchymal to epithelial-like transformation of TNBC cells. Our study shows that nitrofen, and more importantly its analogues, are significantly effective in limiting the invasive potential of TNBC cell lines with minimal cytotoxic effect. Further, we demonstrate that nitrofen its analogues, are very effective in reversing mesenchymal phenotype to a more epithelial-like phenotype. This may be significant for the treatment of patients with mesenchymal-TNBC tumor subtype who are well known to exhibit high resistance to chemotherapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".