MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165644260 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt21.102

Explosion Characteristics of Syngas/air Premixed Flames

2021· article· en· W3165644260 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Manh‐Vu Tran, Gianfranco Scribano

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyngasCombustionMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceAerospace engineeringPhysicsEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Explosion of a fuel/air combustible mixture in a closed system has been recognized as a serious hazard, because it may damage a chamber if there is no proper venting or explosion suppressing device. In the present study, important explosion characteristics of syngas/air flames were investigated in order to evaluate the hazard of the combustion. Results showed the maximum explosion pressure increased from lean (equivalence ratio of 0.8) to an equivalence ratio, of 1.2, then decreased significantly with richer mixtures, indicating that maximum explosion pressure occurred at = 1.2, while explosion time was shortest at = 1.6. Increasing hydrogen content in the fuel blends significantly raised laminar burning velocity and shortened the explosion time, thereby increasing the maximum rate of pressure rise and deflagration index. Normalized peak pressure, the maximum rate of pressure rise and the deflagration index were sensitive to the initial pressure of the mixture, showing that they increased significantly with increased initial pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass TransferSame topicCombustion and Detonation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207