MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165659922 · doi:10.1101/2020.09.11.293993

SOX9 acts as a dynamic pioneer factor inducing stable changes in the chromatin landscape to reprogram endothelial cells

2020· preprint· en· W3165659922 on OpenAlexaff
Bettina M. Fuglerud, Sibyl Drissler, Jeremy Lotto, Tabea L. Stephan, Avinash Thakur, Rebecca Cullum, Pamela A. Hoodless

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsTerry Fox Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNorges Forskningsråd
KeywordsChromatinSOX9EnhancerTranscription factorCell biologyHistoneBiologyMesenchymal stem cellGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The transcription factor SOX9 is expressed in multiple tissues during embryogenesis and directs developmental processes. SOX9 is activated upon endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) in the developing heart, but its role in regulating this process is less clear. Using human umbilical vein endothelial cells as an EndMT model, we show that SOX9 expression alone is sufficient to activate mesenchymal enhancers and steer endothelial cells towards a mesenchymal fate. By genome-wide mapping of the chromatin landscape, we show that SOX9 acts as a pioneer transcription factor, having the ability to open chromatin and lead to deposition of active histone marks at a specific subset of previously silent enhancers, guided by SOX motifs and H2A.Z enrichment. This leads to a switch in enhancer activity states resulting in activation of mesenchymal genes and concurrent suppression of endothelial genes to drive EndMT. Moreover, we show that SOX9 chromatin binding is dynamic, but induces stable changes in the chromatin landscape. Our data also show widespread SOX9 chromatin scanning in silent chromatin that is not associated with SOX motifs or H2A.Z enrichment. Our study highlights the crucial developmental role of SOX9 and provides new insight into key molecular functions of SOX9 in the chromatin landscape and mechanisms of EndMT. Graphical abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207