MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165685030 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2020-0235

Long-term natural dynamics of an alpine lichen heath in the Teberda State Biosphere Reserve, northwestern Caucasus

2021· article· en· W3165685030 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tatiana G. Elumeeva, Д. К. Текеев, Svetlana U. Bairamkulova, В. Г. Онипченко

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyLichenGrowing seasonEcologyTundraAbundance (ecology)Vegetation (pathology)Herbaceous plantBotanyEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The alpine vegetation of Europe and the Caucasus has experienced substantial changes due to climate warming and reduced grazing. Exposed ridge communities, such as alpine heaths, are presumed to be less vulnerable to such processes. Herein, we analyze long-term dynamics (over 37 years) of an alpine lichen heath in the Teberda State Biosphere Reserve, Karachaevo-Cherkessian Republic, Russia. We counted the shoots of all vascular plants present on permanent plots. Autocorrelated linear regressions, a non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination, and a fourth-corner analysis were applied to characterize the relationships between shoot numbers, climate variables (temperatures and precipitation), functional traits, and species strategies. Nine species, including dominant Festuca ovina L. and Antennaria dioica (L.) Gaertn., increased their abundances, whereas Carex spp. were observed to decrease. The overall dynamics were mainly driven by increasing mean temperatures during the growing season (July and August). None of the changes observed in the selected traits were correlated with increasing or decreasing numbers of species; however, some traits (plant height, specific root length, specific leaf area, and leaf carbon content) were potentially associated with climate variables. The observed dynamics suggested an overall increase in the abundance of herbaceous plants. Generally, our results support “greening” effects in tundra and alpine biomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207