New Numerical and Measurements Flow Analyses Near Radars
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experimental and numerical investigation of the flow near a blunt body has been conducted in this study. Most experimental methods of flow studies use flow visualization and probes introduction into the flow field. The main goal of this research was the development of a new methodology to analyze flows, and to measure flow characteristics without taking into account the distorting effects of measuring probes. A series of experiments were performed on a ground surveillance radar in the Price-Païdoussis subsonic wind tunnel. Forces and moments were measured as functions of wind speeds and angular positions by the use of a six-component aerodynamic scale. A Computational Fluid Dynamics three-dimensional model was employed to analyze the wake region of the ground surveillance radar. A turbulence reduction system was proposed and analyzed in this research. The use of the proposed turbulence reduction system was found to be an effective way to reduce turbulent flow intensity by 50%, drag coefficients by 9.6%, and delay the flow transition point by 7.6 times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it