Has the Local Area Network (LAN) the Same Characteristics With the Particle/field Entity? Recovering the Schwarzschild Metric in a Discrete and Flat Spacetime, Using a Diffusion-driven Impurity Model Produced by Partile/LAN Entities.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A local area network (LAN) consists typically of several telecommunication nodes, all of which share a public IP address and a single point of contact with the Internet, namely the router . For an outside observer, the whole LAN with all its nodes would look point-like (having one, shared, "public IP" address and a single connection with the Internet), but in its interactions it would appear field-like , as a LAN of several nodes, each with its own "private IP" address, has an internal structure and interacts with the outside world differently than a single node would. In this study, the above particle/LAN analogy will be used as a basis of Átmiton theory, according to which, elementary particles are made of LANs consisting of a type of telecommunication node - called átmiton - and space is a 3D network of átmita with the simple cubic topology. In this work, it is demonstrated that connecting a particle/LAN entity on the lattice of space distorts its local topology, effectively introducing a crystal defect to the lattice of space. This defect increases the distance between points lying at opposite sides of it. The internal interactions of any massive object should be producing constantly copious numbers of such space-defects, which diffuse away from their source, by means of a random walk. Here it is suggested that general relativity's notion of spacetime's curvature is equivalent to the aforementioned diffusion-driven impurity model in the flat, discrete lattice of space of Átmiton theory. Their equivalency is demonstrated for the specific case of a spherical mass, around which the Schwarzschild metric is shown to be valid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".