MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3165759667

Identification of lncRNAs regulating variable stress-responding sheep naturally exposed to gastrointestinal nematode parasites

2019· preprint· en· W3165759667 on OpenAlexaff
Aroa Suárez‐Vega, Emma Borkowski, S. E. Dixon, Niel A. Karrow, Andrew S. Peregrine, Paula Menzies, Bonnie A. Mallard, Mohammed Boareki, Flávio S. Schenkel, J. J. Arranz, Gwenola Tosser‐Klopp, Christophe Klopp, Ángela Cánovas

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)NematodeBiologyStress (linguistics)ZoologyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Better insight into the genetics of the ovine host response to gastrointestinal nematode parasites will enable improvement in integrated management strategies. Little is known about long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) function in the host response to nematodes infection. Samples from sheep naturally exposed to Haemonchus contortus, Teladorsagia circumcincta and Trichostrongylus gastrointestinal nematodes with High (n = 5) and Moderate (n = 5) cortisol responses, and non-exposed Controls (n = 4) were used to characterize lncRNA changes in liver using RNA-Seq. Samples were aligned to the sheep reference genome (Oar_v.3.1) using STAR software. Cufflinks and Stringtie software were used to construct 2 novel transcript models. FEELnc was used to identify lncRNAs in both approaches obtaining 3,688 and 4,854 lncRNAs with Cufflinks and Stringtie, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for the lncRNA detection were 0.92. The coding potential threshold used to determine if a transcript was characterized as mRNA or lncRNA was 0.42. Among them, 3,307 lncRNAs were shared between the 2 transcript sets. When lncRNA models from the 2 assembly approaches and those shared among methodologies were compared with known sheep lncRNAs, those detected by both assemblers had the highest sensitivity (0.89) and precision (0.54) at the locus level. Common lncRNAs were used for further differential expression (DE) analyses between Control sheep and High and Moderate stress responders. The estimation of reads per lncRNA and DE analyses were performed using RSEM and DESeq2 software. A total of one, 16 and 23 DE lncRNAs were identified between High vs. Moderate, High vs. Control and Moderate vs. Control groups, respectively. Functional analyses performed using the list of genes located in close proximity (0.01–1 Mb window) to the lncRNAs suggested that regulation of steroid metabolism or oxidoreductase activity may influence the different responses to parasites in High and Moderate stress responder sheep. These results indicate that lncRNAs may be used as potential targets or indicators to control for gastrointestinal nematode parasites in sheep.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research→French-language works237,207→