MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165766469 · doi:10.31234/osf.io/smcdv

Dealing with multivariate missing data in principal component analyses and subsequent model estimation: a two-step worked example using data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging

2019· preprint· en· W3165766469 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchConsortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissementUniversity of British ColumbiaGovernment of CanadaRéseau québécois de recherche sur le vieillissement
KeywordsMissing dataImputation (statistics)Principal component analysisRaw dataInferenceStatisticsComputer scienceMultivariate statisticsData miningStatistical inferenceEconometricsMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Missing data can be a significant problem for statistical inference in many disciplines when information is not missing completely at random. In the worst case, it can lead to biased results when participants or subjects with certain characteristics contribute more data than other participants. Multiple imputation methods can be used to alleviate the loss of sample size and correct for this potential bias. Multiple imputation entails filling in the missing data using information from the same and other participants on the variables of interest and potentially other available data that correlate with the variables of interest. The missing data estimates and uncertainty associated with their estimation may then be taken into account in statistical inference from those variables. A complication may arise when using compound variables, such as principal component loadings (PC), which draw on a number of raw variables that themselves have non-overlapping missing data. Here, we propose a sequential multiple imputation approach to facilitate the use of all available data in the raw variables contained in compound variables in a way that conforms to the specifications of the multiple imputation framework. We first use multiple imputation to impute missing data for the subset of raw variables used in a principal component analysis (PCA) and perform the PCA with the imputed data; then, use the factor loadings to calculate PC scores for each individual with complete raw data. Finally, we include these PC scores as part of a global multiple imputation approach to estimate a final statistical model. We demonstrate (including annotated Stata code) the use of this approach by examining which sensory, health, social and cognitive factors explain self-reported sensory difficulties in the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging (CLSA) Comprehensive Cohort. The proposed sequential multiple imputation approach allows us to deal with the issue of having large cumulative amount of data that is missing (not completely at random) among a large number of variables, including composite cognitive scores derived from a battery of cognitive tests. We examine the resulting parameter estimates using a range of recommended diagnostic tools to highlight the potential and consequences of the approach to the statistical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.650
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it