MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165810065 · doi:10.1002/der2.72

Liposuction‐principles, techniques, outcomes

2021· article· en· W3165810065 on OpenAlex
Jayashree Venkataram, Venkataram Mysore

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatological Reviews · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Contouring and Surgery
Canadian institutionsSKiN Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiposuctionMedicineLidocaineAnesthesiaSurgerySaline

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Liposuction is a method of removing unwanted fat through small holes in skin. Tumescent liposuction is a method in which liposuction is performed entirely under local anaesthesia, without any additional intravenous or general anaesthesia. In this method, higher doses of lidocaine are used, often 45 mg/kg, in a highly diluted form in saline along with epinephrine for vasoconstriction. Usually, around 5–6 L of fat is aspirated. This method has been remarkably safe and effective. Powered liposuction, laser liposuction, ultrasound and radiofrequency liposuctions use devices to enhance the efficacy of manual tumescent liposuction. The method has stood the test of time, in both effective and safe outcomes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it