Ion‐poor water and dietary salt deprivation upregulate the ghrelinergic system in the goldfish (<scp><i>Carassius auratus</i></scp>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Because the ghrelinergic system in teleost fishes is broadly expressed in organs that regulate appetite as well as those that contribute to the regulation of salt and water balance, we hypothesized that manipulating salt and water balance in goldfish (Carassius auratus) would modulate the ghrelinergic system. Goldfish were acclimated to either freshwater (FW) or ion‐poor FW (IPW) and were fed either a control diet containing 1% NaCl or low‐salt diet containing 0.1% NaCl. Endpoints of salt and water balance, i.e., serum Na+ and Cl− levels, muscle moisture content and organ‐specific Na+‐K+‐ATPase (NKA) activity, were examined in conjunction with brain, gill and gut mRNA abundance of preproghrelin and its receptor, growth hormone secretagogue receptor (ghs‐r). Acclimation of fish to IPW reduced serum osmolality and Cl− levels and elevated kidney NKA activity, while FW fish fed a low NaCl diet exhibited a modest reduction in muscle moisture content but otherwise no apparent osmoregulatory disturbance. In contrast, a combined treatment of IPW acclimation and low dietary NaCl content reduced serum osmolality and Cl− levels, elevated muscle moisture content and increased gill, kidney and intestinal NKA activity. This intensified response to the combined effects of water and dietary ion deprivation is consistent with an increased effort to enhance ion acquisition. In association with these latter observations, a significant upregulation of preproghrelin mRNA expression in brain and gut was observed. A significant increase in ghs‐r mRNAs was also observed in the gill of goldfish acclimated to IPW alone but a reduction in dietary NaCl content did not impact the ghrelinergic system of goldfish in FW. The results support the hypothesis that the ghrelinergic system is modulated in response to manipulated salt and water balance. Whether the central and peripheral ghrelinergic system contributes to ionic homeostasis in goldfish currently remains unclear and warrants further research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".