Near-threshold scaling of resonant inelastic collisions at ultralow temperatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We show that the cross sections for a broad range of resonant inelastic processes accompanied by excitation exchange (such as spin exchange, F\"orster resonance, or angular momentum exchange) exhibit a near-threshold scaling ${E}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{m}_{12}}$, where $E$ is the collision energy, $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{m}_{12}={m}_{1}^{\ensuremath{'}}+{m}_{2}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{-}{m}_{1}\ensuremath{-}{m}_{2}$, and ${m}_{i}$ and ${m}_{i}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ are the initial and final angular momentum projections of the colliding species ($i=1,2$). In particular, the inelastic cross sections for $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{m}_{12}=0$ transitions display an unconventional ${E}^{0}$ scaling similar to that of elastic cross sections, and their rates vanish as ${T}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{m}_{12}+1/2}$. For collisions dominated by even partial waves (such as those of identical bosons in the same internal state) the scaling is modified to ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{\text{inel}}\ensuremath{\propto}{E}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{m}_{12}+1}$ if $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}{m}_{12}$ is odd. We present accurate quantum scattering calculations that illustrate these modified threshold laws for resonant spin exchange in ultracold $\text{Rb}+\text{Rb}$ and ${\mathrm{O}}_{2}+{\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ collisions. Our results illustrate that the well-known ${k}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ threshold scaling of inelastic cross sections only applies to exothermic, rather than resonant, inelastic processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".