MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Skeletal Muscle Regulatory Responses to Increased Extracellular Lactate

2010· article· en· W3165892794 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Michael I. Lindinger, Matt Leung, Jasmin Moradi, Karin E Shortreed, Thomas J. Hawke

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Physical Performance
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExtracellularOsmotic concentrationSkeletal muscleChemistrySodium lactateSodiumExtracellular fluidIntracellularBiochemistryBiophysicsEndocrinologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mammalian skeletal muscle cells exhibit cell shrinkage followed by regulatory volume increase (RVI) in response to increases in extracellular osmolarity caused by addition of concentrated NaCl or sucrose. We hypothesized that increased extracellular sodium lactate would similarly result in a transient loss of cell volume, followed by RVI, and that the RVI would be more rapid and pronounced than that seen with NaCl due to entry of lactate into the cell. The present study measured the time course of change single fibre width in response to varied increases in extracellular NaCl or Na‐lactate. Adult mouse EDL single fibres were isolated using collagenase and incubated in DMEM prior to and during experimentation. Fibre images were obtained at 3–6 s intervals for up to 40 min. Fibre images were analyzed for width at 2 sites. Increased osmolarity resulted in a rapid decrease in fibre width, followed by RVI. The volume recovery was faster and more complete when [lactate] ≥20 mmol/L. There was a linear relationship between increases extracellular [lactate], cell shrinkage, and magnitude of RVI. It appears that the inward transport of lactate into skeletal muscle contributes, together with increased NKCC activity, to the RVI in mammalian skeletal muscle. Supported by NSERC of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicGenetics and Physical PerformanceFrench-language works237,207