MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Capillary‐Pericyte Relationship in Skeletal Muscle: Implications for Blood Flow Control

2021· article· en· W3165931394 on OpenAlexafffund
Eamon J. H. Fitzpatrick, Coral L. Murrant

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPericyteSkeletal muscleMicrocirculationMural cellVasodilationBlood flowAnatomyChemistryPerfusionBiologyEndothelial stem cellInternal medicineMedicineEndocrinologyBiochemistryIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Pericytes, mural cells of the vasculature, are found adjacent to endothelial cells of capillaries and venules. In the brain, pericytes have been shown to be involved in blood flow control to active nerve tissue. In skeletal muscle, capillaries have been found to be important in directing blood flow to active skeletal muscle fibres. Active skeletal muscle fibres signal capillary endothelial cells to initiate signals that are transmitted upstream, along the blood vessel wall, to cause vasodilation of the upstream arteriole controlling the perfusion of the stimulated capillary. Pericytes have been shown to be associated with the microvasculature in skeletal muscle. If pericytes are closely associated with the capillary wall and capillary endothelial cells, they may be involved in the transmission of the upstream arteriolar vasodilatory signals that control capillary perfusion and blood flow to active skeletal muscle fibres. In order for this to be possible pericytes would have to have to form a continuous, connected layer of cells adjacent to the capillary network such that signals could be passed from pericyte to pericyte upstream to associated arterioles. In order to investigate the potential role of pericytes in blood flow control to skeletal muscle capillaries we investigated 1) whether pericytes were associated with capillaries in skeletal muscle and 2) whether pericytes form a continuous layer adjacent to the capillary network. Methods We used histological techniques, sectioning male mouse slow‐oxidative (soleus (SOL)), and fast‐oxidative‐glycolytic muscle (diaphragm (DIA)) both cross sectionally and longitudinally in order to identify capillary endothelial cells (using isolectin) in cross section and to view capillaries along their length. We then double stained these sections with neural‐glial antigen 2 (NG2) to identify the association of pericytes with capillary endothelial cells. Results Cross sectional analysis of 3 SOL muscles (273 capillaries counted) showed that 63.2+/‐4.9% (avg+/‐ std. dev.) of capillaries were associated with pericytes while 36.8+/‐4.9% of capillaries were not associated with pericytes. Cross sectional analysis of 2 DIA muscles (208 capillaries counted) showed that 53.6+/‐7.7% of capillaries were associated with pericytes while 46.4+/‐7.7% of capillaries were not associated with pericytes. In both muscle types, analysis of longitudinal sections, where capillaries could be viewed along their length, showed a lack of consistent association with pericytes. Conclusions We identified that, while there was an association between pericytes and capillary endothelial cells in skeletal muscle, not all capillary endothelial cells were associated with pericytes. Further, when capillaries were viewed along their length, pericytes were not consistently located adjacent to the capillary network. Our data indicate that pericytes may not form a continuous layer alongside the capillary network and may not be able to conduct vasodilatory signals from pericyte to pericyte to communicate with upstream arterioles and, therefore, may not be able to alter blood flow to active skeletal muscle fibres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→