The effect of organizational culture on quality of accounting information: Mediating the role of accounting information system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Organizational culture has been documented as a driving force of the acceptance of accounting information systems in business and accounting information quality; whereas accounting information quality as a causation of the acceptance of accounting information systems in business. The acceptance of accounting information systems in business could mediate the causal connection from organizational culture to accounting information quality. Nonetheless, nearly none of the projects has assessed the mediating role of the acceptance of accounting information systems in business, especially in Vietnam as a developing country. The current research tries to investigate the mediation of the acceptance of accounting information systems in business in the research model. The findings indicate that the acceptance of accounting information systems in business transmits part of the influence of organizational culture on accounting information quality. The current research could make some contributions to how executives ought to decide on organizational culture as well as on the acceptance of accounting information systems in business so that their organizational performance could be improved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it