MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165958555

Continued Alienation of the Whitened Othellos in Djanet Sears`s Harlem Duet

2016· article· en· W3165958555 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
유가을

Bibliographic record

Venue현대영어영문학 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlienationBlack womenRace (biology)GirlBlack feminismBlack femaleGender studiesSociologyAfrican americanArtPsychologyAnthropologyLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Casting only African descendants on the Canadian stage, a prominent African Canadian playwright, Djanet Sears vividly reveals the reality and the problems of black people, the black community and their alienation in her play Harlem Duet. By retelling William Shakespeare’s Othello with the 1990s Harlem setting in the U.S., Sears highlights how the black male character, Othello, and his former black girl friend, Billie, internalize racist views of blackness, which consequently leads them to self-alienation. In particular, by suggesting the past presences of the black duets in three anti-linear time settings - 1860, 1928, and present - Sears signifies alienation of black people has remained a longstanding issue. By concentrating on the issues of race and gender in Djanet Sears’s Harlem Duet, especially on black male characters’ stances, this paper focuses on how the ongoing problem in alienation of black people is examined in this play. (Yonsei University)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0240.010
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue현대영어영문학Same topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207