Thinking about the Holy Land and crusading in the Crowns of Aragon and Navarre (thirteenth century)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Holy Land and the Crusades continued to be a point of reference in the thoughts and ambitions of many men and women in the Hispanic territories of the Crowns of Aragon and Navarre during the thirteenth century. This chapter examines how the Holy Land was perceived through its principal agents, the Templars and Hospitallers, who were understood a priori to be the most direct representatives of the Holy Land. In terms of political practice and ideology, the Holy Land was a key issue in the consolidation of the image of the king, who would not only lead the Crusades but was also expected to play a leading role in them in relation to the pope during a period of incipient international relations. The vicissitudes of the Guelph-Ghibelline conflict in relation to the Kingdom of Sicily, conditioned the diplomatic activities concerning a reactivation of the Crusades at this point in time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it