MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166022010 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20025082

Development and Validation of a Pruritic Index to Assess the Impact of Chorioptic Mange Infestation in Dairy Cows

2002· article· en· W3166022010 on OpenAlexaffabout
K. J. Day, K.E. Leslie, T.F. Duffield, Jocelyn Jansen, William Sears, Ian R. Dohoo, Javier Sánchez

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicHelminth infection and control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward IslandMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMangeInfestationDairy cattleVeterinary medicineMilk productionAnimal scienceBiologyMedicineAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies reported a significant negative association between presence of mange lesions and reduced milk production in early lactation. In addition, there was a significant positive production response to moxidectin therapy in the transition period. However, the biological reasons for these effects were not described. It is suspected that mange infestation results in intense pruritis and decreased dry matter intake. This experiment sought to develop and validate a semi-quantitative scoring system to categorize the degree of pruritis in mange-infested dairy cattle. In addition, the association between Pruritic Index Score, Mange Lesion Score, presence of Chorioptes mites, measures of productivity, and response to endectocide treatment in Ontario dairy cattle was examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicHelminth infection and controlFrench-language works237,207