MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Circulating Dehydroepiandrosterone and Testosterone are Differentially Associated with Motor Unit Function in Young and Masters Athletes

2021· article· en· W3166053107 on OpenAlexaff
Yuxiao Guo, Jessica Piasecki, Agnieszka Święcicka, Alex Ireland, Bethan E. Phillips, Philip J. Atherton, Daniel W. Stashuk, Martin K. Rutter, Jamie S. McPhee, Mathew Piasecki

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineTestosterone (patch)EndocrinologyAnabolismIsometric exerciseDehydroepiandrosteroneDehydroepiandrosterone sulfateHormoneMedicineAthletesYoung adultAndrogenMotor unitPsychologyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Age‐related neuromuscular decrements are partly attributed to the gradual decline of circulating sex hormones, accompanied by the transition of metabolic processes from largely anabolic to catabolic, which is further mediated by levels of physical activity [1, 2]. Administration of androgens have been demonstrated to positively influence processes of neuroplasticity in animal models [3, 4], acting both centrally and peripherally. However, human data on the associations of circulating hormone levels with peripheral motor nerve function are scant. The aim of this study was to determine associations of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and testosterone (T) with motor unit (MU) characteristics in human vastus lateralis (VL), and to investigate the influences of ageing and athletic status. Methods 75 men were studied based on age (young: 20‐35yrs; old: 61‐81yrs) and competitive athletic status (control, endurance and power). Blood concentrations of DHEA and T were quantified using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Intramuscular electromyographic signals were recorded from VL during 25% maximum isometric contractions and decomposed to extract motor unit firing rate (MU FR), and motor unit potential (MUP) duration, and complexity (number of turns). Multi‐level mixed effects linear regression models were performed to explore the effects of age and athletic status. Significance was assumed when p < 0.05. Results After adjusting for athletic status, MU FR was positively associated with DHEA levels in both young ( β [95% CI ]: 0.06 [0.001 to 0.11], p =0.046) and old (0.15 [0.02 to 0.27], p =0.02). Higher T was associated with shorter MUP duration in all young (‐0.01 [‐0.19 to ‐0.01], p =0.03) and lower complexity in all old (‐0.04 [‐0.08 to ‐0.004], p =0.03); these relationships remained significant after adjusting for athletic status. Conclusions DHEA has established neuroprotective effects which improve strength in frailty [5], possibly mediated by MU FR as shown in all ages here. Young males with higher levels of T exhibited shorter MUP duration, indicating reduced electrophysiological temporal dispersion across MU fibres. In old, higher T levels were associated with reduced MUP complexity, also indicating reduced electrophysiological temporal dispersion across MU fibres. In both cases, this is related to reduced differences in conduction times along axonal branches and/or MU fibres. Although evident in males only, this work highlights the potential of hormone administration as a therapeutic interventional strategy specifically targeting the human neuromuscular systems in older age. References 1. Korhonen et al., 2006, J Appl Physiol 2. Proctor et al., 1998, J Nutr 3. Kurz et al., 1986, Science 4. Blanco et al., 2001, J Appl Physiol 5. Kenny et al., 2010, J Am Geriatr Soc

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques→French-language works237,207→