Several PDE4‐family enzymes differentially regulate EPAC1‐mediated actions during VEC tubule formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies have established that several angiogenesis‐related actions of vascular endothelial cells (VECs) are differentially affected by cAMP‐elevating agents. This selectivity is coordinated, in part, by actions of cAMP at individual VEC cAMP‐signaling complexes. Indeed, recently we showed that EPAC1‐integration into a phosphodiesterase 3B (PDE3B)‐based VEC cAMP‐signalosome allows PDE3 inhibitors to activate PI3Kã and promote VEC adhesion to matrigel, an early event in tubules formation. Since EPAC1 integrates into a PDE4D‐containing, VE‐cadherin‐based, cAMP signalosomes that allows EPAC1 to control VEC intercellular contacts, but not adhesions, we investigated how PDE4 inhibitors impacted VEC tubule formation. Our findings identify distinct roles for each PDE4B and PDE4D in the control of EPAC1‐mediated effects in tubule formation and identify potential novel therapeutic strategies to control these angiogenesis‐related events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".