Mysterious Death of Chevalier de Bourdon: on History of Political Struggle in France in the First Quarter of the 15th Century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the features of policy of king Charles VI of France in the last years of his reign. Based on a comparative analysis of a wide range of sources, the author reconstructs the events of the spring of 1417, which resulted in the arrest by order of the king of the Grand master of the Palace of Queen Isabella Chevalier Louis de Bourdon. It is reported that after a short investigation conducted by the provost of Paris, he was secretly executed; soon Isabella was removed from power and sent to Blois. The author of the article made an attempt to find out the reasons that caused such changes in the policy of king Charles VI. To answer the question, it was necessary to trace the fate of the participants in the events in Vincennes, in particular Chevalier Pierre de Giac. It was established that he died under similar circumstances and that he was charged with practicing dark magic. As a result of the study it was concluded that a possible reason for the removal of the Queen from Paris could be a suspicion of practicing black magic. A question is raised about the relationship between domestic and foreign policy of France during this period, since the expulsion of the Queen led her to an Alliance with the Duke of Burgundy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".